Purity, Sacrifice, and the Temple: Symbolism and Supersessionism in the Study of Ancient Judaism
Jonathan Klawans
Oxford University Press, 2006 - Religion - 372 pages

Ancient
Jewish sacrifice has long been misunderstood. Some find in sacrifice
the key to the mysterious and violent origins of human culture. Others
see these cultic rituals as merely the fossilized vestiges of primitive
superstition. Some believe that ancient Jewish sacrifice was doomed from
the start, destined to be replaced by the Christian eucharist. Others
think that the temple was fated to be superseded by the synagogue. In
Purity, Sacrifice, and the Temple Jonathan Klawans demonstrates that
these supersessionist ideologies have prevented scholars from
recognizing the Jerusalem temple as a powerful source of meaning and
symbolism to the ancient Jews who worshiped there. Klawans exposes and
counters such ideologies by reviewing the theoretical literature on
sacrifice and taking a fresh look at a broad range of evidence
concerning ancient Jewish attitudes toward the temple and its
sacrificial cult. The first step toward reaching a more balanced view is
to integrate the study of sacrifice with the study of purity-a ritual
structure that has commonly been understood as symbolic by scholars and
laypeople alike. The second step is to rehabilitate sacrificial
metaphors, with the understanding that these metaphors are windows into
the ways sacrifice was understood by ancient Jews. By taking these
steps-and by removing contemporary religious and cultural biases-Klawans
allows us to better understand what sacrifice meant to the early
communities who practiced it. Armed with this new understanding, Klawans
reevaluates the ideas about the temple articulated in a wide array of
ancient sources, including Josephus, Philo, Pseudepigrapha, the Dead Sea
Scrolls, New Testament, and Rabbinic literature. Klawans mines these
sources with an eye toward illuminating the symbolic meanings of
sacrifice for ancient Jews. Along the way, he reconsiders the ostensible
rejection of the cult by the biblical prophets, the Qumran sect, and
Jesus. While these figures may have seen the temple in their time as
tainted or even defiled, Klawans argues, they too-like practically all
ancient Jews-believed in the cult, accepted its symbolic significance,
and hoped for its ultimate efficacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment